Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feature request: cargo-fuzz #295

Open
onkoe opened this issue Dec 2, 2023 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #352
Open

feature request: cargo-fuzz #295

onkoe opened this issue Dec 2, 2023 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #352
Assignees
@taiki-e
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@onkoe
Copy link

onkoe commented Dec 2, 2023

it'd be nice to have :)
@taiki-e taiki-e added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 2, 2023
@taiki-e
Copy link
Owner

taiki-e commented Dec 2, 2023

I would accept a PR to support this.

See DEVELOPMENT.md for how to add support for a new tool.

(FWIW, this action maybe already supports cargo-fuzz via binstall fallback.)

@onkoe
Copy link
Author

onkoe commented Dec 2, 2023

You're right - cargo-binstall fallback is working! Do you think it's still worth adding it formally, or is it "good enough" as-is? 😄

@taiki-e
Copy link
Owner

taiki-e commented Dec 3, 2023

Do you think it's still worth adding it formally

Yeah, it would still be worth it because the officially supported tools have somehhow better installation performance and robustness.

@taiki-e taiki-e linked a pull request Jan 26, 2024 that will close this issue
Draft
@taiki-e taiki-e self-assigned this Apr 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@taiki-e taiki-e

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Support cargo-fuzz taiki-e/install-action
2 participants
@taiki-e @onkoe