Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use PropertyAccessorInterface instead of PropertyAccessor #30136

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 12, 2019
Merged

use PropertyAccessorInterface instead of PropertyAccessor #30136

merged 1 commit into from Feb 12, 2019

Conversation

nick-zh
Copy link
Contributor

@nick-zh nick-zh commented Feb 11, 2019

[Validator] [Constraints] use PropertyAccessorInterface instead of PropertyAccessor

Q A
Branch? master
Bug fix? no
New feature? no
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Tests pass? yes
Fixed tickets #30133 (partially)
License MIT
Doc PR none

@chalasr chalasr added this to the next milestone Feb 11, 2019
Copy link
Member

@ogizanagi ogizanagi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch. Should we backport to 3.4 actually?

Copy link
Member

@fabpot fabpot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like something for 3.4 indeed.

@nick-zh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nick-zh commented Feb 12, 2019

I don't know how you guys usually handle this, but since the change is very small and probably has no negative impact, it could make sense. Let me know if i should open PR's for other branches as well.

@fabpot fabpot changed the base branch from master to 3.4 February 12, 2019 07:15
@fabpot
Copy link
Member

fabpot commented Feb 12, 2019

Thank you @nick-zh.

@fabpot fabpot merged commit 3e3ca9d into symfony:3.4 Feb 12, 2019
fabpot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2019
…(nick-zh)

This PR was submitted for the master branch but it was squashed and merged into the 3.4 branch instead (closes #30136).

Discussion
----------

use PropertyAccessorInterface instead of PropertyAccessor

[Validator] [Constraints] use PropertyAccessorInterface instead of PropertyAccessor

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch?       | master
| Bug fix?      | no
| New feature?  | no
| BC breaks?    | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass?   | yes
| Fixed tickets | #30133 (partially)
| License       | MIT
| Doc PR        | none

Commits
-------

3e3ca9d use PropertyAccessorInterface instead of PropertyAccessor
@chalasr chalasr modified the milestones: next, 3.4 Feb 12, 2019
This was referenced Mar 3, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants