Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a page on Internationalization to the docs #12160

Open
LorisSigrist opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Add a page on Internationalization to the docs #12160

LorisSigrist opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@LorisSigrist
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the problem

Internationalization is clearly very important to SvelteKit & the community, as shown by the

Despite this, when you currently search "i18n" on kit.svelte.dev you get no results.

Screenshot 2024-04-24 at 14 44 28

IMO, this goes counter to Svelte's "simple questions should have simple answers" ethos.

Describe the proposed solution

Add a Page to the documentation on Internationalization that outlines:

  • The current state of development
    • Why SvelteKit does not yet offer i18n out of the box
    • The goals for a first-party i18n solution
    • Where to contribute to the discussion
  • Which i18n solutions SvelteKit users can use today

This would give people a quick overview of the state of affairs & give them a starting-off point

Alternatives considered

do nothing

Importance

nice to have

Additional Information

As someone who has built several i18n libraries I obviously place higher importance on i18n than most people. Perhaps others don't place the same importance on i18n & are fine with the current state.

@eltigerchino eltigerchino added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants