Document justification as part of extended descriptions for applicable rules

[eviathan]

Describe the documentation issue

There are a lot of rules and not much explanation as to why they are explicitly/ technically problematic and why they are included.

What solution would you like to see?

Either remove the rules or justify why they exist.

[jeddy3]

@eviathan Thanks for the report and for using the template.

We recently got better at doing this, e.g. the extended description for the color-function-notation rule or the upcoming selector-not-notation one. However, there are a number of historical rules that would benefit from extended descriptions.

I've labelled the issue as ready to implement. Please consider contributing if you have time.

It'd be fantastic if you could list the rules that you feel are in most need of justification so that we know where to start.

[eviathan]

@jeddy3 If I can find the time I certainly can help you find the rules I am not sure I can help with the rationales for a lot of them though.

[jeddy3]

If I can find the time I certainly can help you find the rules

That'd be great!

I am not sure I can help with the rationales for a lot of them though.

I can help here as I had a hand in the original discussions for most of the rules, and there's a good chance I'll remember the rationale for them.

[github-actions]

This issue is older than one month. Please ask before opening a pull request, as it may no longer be relevant.