Add ignoreAtRules: [] to no-invalid-position-at-import-rule

[GrimLink]

It would be nice to have an option to keep the no-invalid-position-at-import-rule on and also support @use.
This syntax is used by both Sass but some PostCSS plugins also use at rules in the CSS directly.
Adding this option give some flexibility.

Not a must for me, but it would be a nice to have.

[ybiquitous]

@GrimLink Can you check #5322, please?

[GrimLink]

@ybiquitous I did 😉
And the related tickets.

I am not having an issue with it at the moment,
since I just disabled the rule no-invalid-position-at-import-rule in my scss config.

I am just asking for an option so I can keep no-invalid-position-at-import-rule enabled,
and also allow other at-rules on top.

[ybiquitous]

I see. Is it possible to use /* stylelint-disable */ inline comments in your case?

For example:

/* stylelint-disable-next-line no-invalid-position-at-import-rule */
@use "...";

@import "...";

See also https://stylelint.io/user-guide/ignore-code/#within-files

[GrimLink]

@ybiquitous it is for me,
but I also work in a team.
And my colleges only use stylelint and don't configure it or exclude rules.
Which you want to avoid to keep consistency.

I was just wondering this could be an option, as I already mentioned in my previous comments

[Semigradsky]

Ideally it would be to create scss/at-import-no-invalid-position rule but option would be nice workaround.

[ybiquitous]

@Semigradsky Thanks for the help. As you commented, it seems ideal also to me to add a new rule to the stylelint-scss plugin like scss/at-rule-unknown. The rule handles @use internally.

[jeddy3]

@GrimLink Thanks for the request.

Adding this option give some flexibility.

I agree. The primary purpose of secondary options is to make rules more permissive. We can add an ignoreAtRules: [] secondary option to the rule.

As @Semigradsky and @ybiquitous suggested, this would eventually make it into stylelint-scss as scss/at-import-no-invalid-position, which would make use of this new ignoreAtRules: [] secondary option and the checkAgainstRule util.

I've labelled the issue as ready to implement. Please consider contributing if you have time.

There are steps on how to add a new option in the Developer guide.

Please branch of v14 rather than master.

---

For context, this earlier comment is about @import being proceeded by rule-sets rather than other at-rules. This request is different as it about the interplay between @use and @import.

[jeddy3]

Done in #5520