We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AccountDebited
Describe the bug Asset properties missing from AccountDebited interface
What version are you on? 10.0.1
10.0.1
To Reproduce Check effects type definitions. AccountCredited inherits the fields in question from OfferAsset.
AccountCredited
OfferAsset
export interface AccountCredited extends BaseEffectRecord, OfferAsset { type_i: EffectType.account_credited; amount: string; } export interface AccountDebited extends BaseEffectRecord { type_i: EffectType.account_debited; amount: string; }
Expected behavior Handling AccountDebited objects should allow access to the currently not defined fields (i.e. asset_code, asset_issuer, asset_type).
asset_code
asset_issuer
asset_type
Additional context Maybe it would be cleaner to not import those fields from the OfferAsset interface.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Describe the bug
Asset properties missing from
AccountDebited
interfaceWhat version are you on?
10.0.1
To Reproduce
Check effects type definitions.
AccountCredited
inherits the fields in question fromOfferAsset
.Expected behavior
Handling
AccountDebited
objects should allow access to the currently not defined fields (i.e.asset_code
,asset_issuer
,asset_type
).Additional context
Maybe it would be cleaner to not import those fields from the
OfferAsset
interface.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: