You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think for proportion_confint it should be just one interval at 2*alpha, except for "beta-test" which is minlike, and the one-sided will correspond to one side of equal-tail intervals.
I don't have a guess on one-sided interval for multinomial_proportions_confint. (too long ago). But it might be based on an equal-tail derivation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@josef-pkt
Hi, Josef.
I read the thread and agree that the one-sided interval is the same as one side of the two-sided interval for doubled alpha in a binomial distribution.
Can I take this issue on propotion_confint to add an option to explicitly get one-sided ci?
Yes, we want to add the alternative option and include one sided intervals.
Note, "binomtest" will have different one-sided intervals which should be easy to compute.
The will be the same as for the central, equal-tail binom test.
see
https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/646445/multinomial-one-sided-confidence-intervals
same for multinomial_proportions_confint
I think for proportion_confint it should be just one interval at 2*alpha, except for "beta-test" which is minlike, and the one-sided will correspond to one side of equal-tail intervals.
I don't have a guess on one-sided interval for multinomial_proportions_confint. (too long ago). But it might be based on an equal-tail derivation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: