You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just spent a lot of time trying to find out why a set of profile-specific configuration properties were not loaded in my app after I upgraded to 2.4.2. Simplified example:
application-include.yaml
spring:
profiles:
include:
- included
application-included.yaml:
foo: included
The application started (with -Dspring.profiles.active=include), but the foo property was not there.
After some searching I found that this is no longer supported in 2.4. If I had written:
spring:
profiles:
include: included
I would have gotten an error message on application startup. But the validation logic in InvalidConfigDataPropertyException looks explicitly for spring.profiles.included, while the YAML I used translates to spring.profiles.included[0].
I admit I should have started by reading the release notes, which would have pointed me to the migration guide.
Still, making the validation detect this case as well might save others some time. Maybe the error message could even contain a link to the migration guide.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I just spent a lot of time trying to find out why a set of profile-specific configuration properties were not loaded in my app after I upgraded to 2.4.2. Simplified example:
application-include.yaml
application-included.yaml
:The application started (with
-Dspring.profiles.active=include
), but thefoo
property was not there.After some searching I found that this is no longer supported in 2.4. If I had written:
I would have gotten an error message on application startup. But the validation logic in
InvalidConfigDataPropertyException
looks explicitly forspring.profiles.included
, while the YAML I used translates tospring.profiles.included[0]
.I admit I should have started by reading the release notes, which would have pointed me to the migration guide.
Still, making the validation detect this case as well might save others some time. Maybe the error message could even contain a link to the migration guide.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: