Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The 'paperclip' gem has security vulnerabilities and should be updated #8576

Closed
zjullion opened this issue Feb 1, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@zjullion
Copy link

zjullion commented Feb 1, 2018

Version 5.1.0 of paperclip has a security vulnerability: thoughtbot/paperclip#2435

You should update to 5.2.0 as soon as possible.

@bbonislawski
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for reporting, but this issue is already fixed with 0131a7e . Please consider verifying issues like that before you post anything since it wastes our time to check issues like that.

@vernondegoede
Copy link
Contributor

vernondegoede commented Apr 5, 2018

The latest version which is available on Rubygems is 3.4.4. This version still has paperclip 4.1.0 as a dependency.

Can you publish a 3.4.5 version which uses paperclip 5.2.0?

@damianlegawiec
Copy link
Member

Hey @vernondegoede 3.4.4 uses paperclip 5.1.0 but we'll release 3.4.5 with paperclip 5.2.0today :)

@damianlegawiec damianlegawiec reopened this Apr 5, 2018
@damianlegawiec damianlegawiec self-assigned this Apr 5, 2018
@vernondegoede
Copy link
Contributor

Great! Thanks @damianlegawiec

@vernondegoede
Copy link
Contributor

vernondegoede commented Apr 10, 2018

@bbonislawski @damianlegawiec Any update on this issue? Anything I can do to help?

@damianlegawiec
Copy link
Member

@vernondegoede both 3.3.5 and 3.4.5 containing the fix were pushed to RubyGems yesterday - sorry for the late update!

https://github.com/spree/spree/releases/tag/v3.3.5
https://github.com/spree/spree/releases/tag/v3.4.5

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants