Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add note on conditional reporting of violation #1247

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 10, 2020
Merged

Add note on conditional reporting of violation #1247

merged 1 commit into from Aug 10, 2020

Conversation

pzygielo
Copy link
Contributor

@pzygielo pzygielo commented Aug 4, 2020

Per 618c4ad (change is still in place).

However one has to browse The Code to learn why such violation is not reported by default.

I expected to see this bug, but it wasn't reported on several first tries of intentionally changing inspected sources. So finally I found commit referenced above (unfortunately it does not provide reasoning for change).

Maybe the need of property is mentioned somewhere else, but I think it could also be disclosed in bug description.

@pzygielo pzygielo marked this pull request as ready for review August 4, 2020 20:45
Copy link
Member

@KengoTODA KengoTODA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I will add Japanese translation in another PR.

@KengoTODA KengoTODA merged commit 67f8791 into spotbugs:master Aug 10, 2020
@pzygielo pzygielo deleted the transient-field-of-nonserializable branch August 10, 2020 06:33
KengoTODA added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2020
KengoTODA added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants