New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
texinfo indentation bug? #3080
Comments
Sorry, I should have been more precise: the expected output for texinfo is
(it must be on one line) |
I would like to ask yet another question in the same spirit. The sphinx source is
which in texinfo becomes
which in turn is the following mess in the final info-manual:
The same thing looks OK in html (each reference on one line, all decorated by a vertical bar on the left). So, the question is as above: is the sphinx source bad, or does the texinfo-builder need improvements. If the answer is the latter, could you give me a hint, where to look (I suppose I should tweak |
for info: it looks also ok in latex PDF output |
I found out how to solve the first problem. In
I think one should do the same also for |
Hm, not quite, because now there are to few newlines elsewhere :-( |
there is a patch at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21734 now. However, it still needs work. |
I updated the branch on https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21734 so that it's easily visible, but its been too long, so I cannot tell anymore what remains to be done... |
I just checked, the blocker to enable a texinfo build for sagemath is issue #3089 (which has been closed because too difficult to fix). |
Fix #3080: multiline rubrics and citations are broken in texinfo builder
Fixed by #5600. |
when producing texinfo documentation from
I obtain
Is this a bug in sphinx or is there too little indentation after before
symbolic expressions
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: