Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

shell completion should behave uniformly for bash and zsh when sourced #986

Closed
srlehn opened this issue Nov 7, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Comments

@srlehn
Copy link

srlehn commented Nov 7, 2019

I was under the assumption that because . <(app genshcomp) ("app genshcomp" returns shell completion code) worked for bash that the generated zsh code should behave the same for zsh. I can't see any reason to block this behaviour for zsh if only a single line has to be added (#887).

For my portable application I value the ability to directly inject the completion code into the running shell without having to save a temporary file or additional commands.

I suggest reopening #887, at least for me it works fine.

@corneliusweig
Copy link

Big 👍

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 3, 2020

This issue is being marked as stale due to a long period of inactivity

@marckhouzam
Copy link
Collaborator

This article gives some reason why sourcing a completion script isn't great: https://medium.com/@jzelinskie/please-dont-ship-binaries-with-shell-completion-as-commands-a8b1bcb8a0d0

That being said, what you can do is add the missing compdef line to your .zshrc (or something of the sort) and then sourcing the completion file will work.

@marckhouzam
Copy link
Collaborator

I believe @jharshman has confirmed he prefers to follow zsh's best practices and not include the compdef line in the script: #1070 (comment)

The program using Cobra can easily choose to add this line itself.

@jharshman I believe we can close this issue.

@jharshman
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, that is correct @marckhouzam. Closing this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants