From 1ebb576c1d2fa827ddf7f50abf7c1e04eff94d2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Khouzam Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 16:23:36 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Update shell completion to respect flag groups Signed-off-by: Marc Khouzam --- completions.go | 3 + completions_test.go | 186 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ flag_groups.go | 49 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 238 insertions(+) diff --git a/completions.go b/completions.go index 7a9a7fade..2c2483998 100644 --- a/completions.go +++ b/completions.go @@ -325,6 +325,9 @@ func (c *Command) getCompletions(args []string) (*Command, []string, ShellCompDi var completions []string var directive ShellCompDirective + // Enforce flag groups before doing flag completions + finalCmd.enforceFlagGroupsForCompletion() + // Note that we want to perform flagname completion even if finalCmd.DisableFlagParsing==true; // doing this allows for completion of persistent flag names even for commands that disable flag parsing. // diff --git a/completions_test.go b/completions_test.go index 28a3228e3..fa087fd9e 100644 --- a/completions_test.go +++ b/completions_test.go @@ -2691,3 +2691,189 @@ func TestFixedCompletions(t *testing.T) { t.Errorf("expected: %q, got: %q", expected, output) } } + +func TestCompletionForGroupedFlags(t *testing.T) { + getCmd := func() *Command { + rootCmd := &Command{ + Use: "root", + Run: emptyRun, + } + childCmd := &Command{ + Use: "child", + ValidArgsFunction: func(cmd *Command, args []string, toComplete string) ([]string, ShellCompDirective) { + return []string{"subArg"}, ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp + }, + Run: emptyRun, + } + rootCmd.AddCommand(childCmd) + + rootCmd.PersistentFlags().Int("ingroup1", -1, "ingroup1") + rootCmd.PersistentFlags().String("ingroup2", "", "ingroup2") + + childCmd.Flags().Bool("ingroup3", false, "ingroup3") + childCmd.Flags().Bool("nogroup", false, "nogroup") + + // Add flags to a group + childCmd.MarkFlagsRequiredTogether("ingroup1", "ingroup2", "ingroup3") + + return rootCmd + } + + // Each test case uses a unique command from the function above. + testcases := []struct { + desc string + args []string + expectedOutput string + }{ + { + desc: "flags in group not suggested without - prefix", + args: []string{"child", ""}, + expectedOutput: strings.Join([]string{ + "subArg", + ":4", + "Completion ended with directive: ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp", ""}, "\n"), + }, + { + desc: "flags in group suggested with - prefix", + args: []string{"child", "-"}, + expectedOutput: strings.Join([]string{ + "--ingroup1", + "--ingroup2", + "--ingroup3", + "--nogroup", + ":4", + "Completion ended with directive: ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp", ""}, "\n"), + }, + { + desc: "when flag in group present, other flags in group suggested even without - prefix", + args: []string{"child", "--ingroup2", "value", ""}, + expectedOutput: strings.Join([]string{ + "--ingroup1", + "--ingroup3", + "subArg", + ":4", + "Completion ended with directive: ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp", ""}, "\n"), + }, + { + desc: "when all flags in group present, flags not suggested without - prefix", + args: []string{"child", "--ingroup1", "8", "--ingroup2", "value2", "--ingroup3", ""}, + expectedOutput: strings.Join([]string{ + "subArg", + ":4", + "Completion ended with directive: ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp", ""}, "\n"), + }, + { + desc: "group ignored if some flags not applicable", + args: []string{"--ingroup2", "value", ""}, + expectedOutput: strings.Join([]string{ + "child", + "completion", + "help", + ":4", + "Completion ended with directive: ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp", ""}, "\n"), + }, + } + + for _, tc := range testcases { + t.Run(tc.desc, func(t *testing.T) { + c := getCmd() + args := []string{ShellCompNoDescRequestCmd} + args = append(args, tc.args...) + output, err := executeCommand(c, args...) + switch { + case err == nil && output != tc.expectedOutput: + t.Errorf("expected: %q, got: %q", tc.expectedOutput, output) + case err != nil: + t.Errorf("Unexpected error %q", err) + } + }) + } +} + +func TestCompletionForMutuallyExclusiveFlags(t *testing.T) { + getCmd := func() *Command { + rootCmd := &Command{ + Use: "root", + Run: emptyRun, + } + childCmd := &Command{ + Use: "child", + ValidArgsFunction: func(cmd *Command, args []string, toComplete string) ([]string, ShellCompDirective) { + return []string{"subArg"}, ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp + }, + Run: emptyRun, + } + rootCmd.AddCommand(childCmd) + + rootCmd.PersistentFlags().IntSlice("ingroup1", []int{1}, "ingroup1") + rootCmd.PersistentFlags().String("ingroup2", "", "ingroup2") + + childCmd.Flags().Bool("ingroup3", false, "ingroup3") + childCmd.Flags().Bool("nogroup", false, "nogroup") + + // Add flags to a group + childCmd.MarkFlagsMutuallyExclusive("ingroup1", "ingroup2", "ingroup3") + + return rootCmd + } + + // Each test case uses a unique command from the function above. + testcases := []struct { + desc string + args []string + expectedOutput string + }{ + { + desc: "flags in mutually exclusive group not suggested without the - prefix", + args: []string{"child", ""}, + expectedOutput: strings.Join([]string{ + "subArg", + ":4", + "Completion ended with directive: ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp", ""}, "\n"), + }, + { + desc: "flags in mutually exclusive group suggested with the - prefix", + args: []string{"child", "-"}, + expectedOutput: strings.Join([]string{ + "--ingroup1", + "--ingroup2", + "--ingroup3", + "--nogroup", + ":4", + "Completion ended with directive: ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp", ""}, "\n"), + }, + { + desc: "when flag in mutually exclusive group present, other flags in group not suggested even with the - prefix", + args: []string{"child", "--ingroup1", "8", "-"}, + expectedOutput: strings.Join([]string{ + "--ingroup1", // Should be suggested again since it is a slice + "--nogroup", + ":4", + "Completion ended with directive: ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp", ""}, "\n"), + }, + { + desc: "group ignored if some flags not applicable", + args: []string{"--ingroup1", "8", "-"}, + expectedOutput: strings.Join([]string{ + "--ingroup1", + "--ingroup2", + ":4", + "Completion ended with directive: ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp", ""}, "\n"), + }, + } + + for _, tc := range testcases { + t.Run(tc.desc, func(t *testing.T) { + c := getCmd() + args := []string{ShellCompNoDescRequestCmd} + args = append(args, tc.args...) + output, err := executeCommand(c, args...) + switch { + case err == nil && output != tc.expectedOutput: + t.Errorf("expected: %q, got: %q", tc.expectedOutput, output) + case err != nil: + t.Errorf("Unexpected error %q", err) + } + }) + } +} diff --git a/flag_groups.go b/flag_groups.go index 1dba424ad..dc7843119 100644 --- a/flag_groups.go +++ b/flag_groups.go @@ -172,3 +172,52 @@ func sortedKeys(m map[string]map[string]bool) []string { sort.Strings(keys) return keys } + +// enforceFlagGroupsForCompletion will do the following: +// - when a flag in a group is present, other flags in the group will be marked required +// - when a flag in a mutually exclusive group is present, other flags in the group will be marked as hidden +// This allows the standard completion logic to behave appropriately for flag groups +func (c *Command) enforceFlagGroupsForCompletion() { + if c.DisableFlagParsing { + return + } + + flags := c.Flags() + groupStatus := map[string]map[string]bool{} + mutuallyExclusiveGroupStatus := map[string]map[string]bool{} + c.Flags().VisitAll(func(pflag *flag.Flag) { + processFlagForGroupAnnotation(flags, pflag, requiredAsGroup, groupStatus) + processFlagForGroupAnnotation(flags, pflag, mutuallyExclusive, mutuallyExclusiveGroupStatus) + }) + + // If a flag that is part of a group is present, we make all the other flags + // of that group required so that the shell completion suggests them automatically + for flagList, flagnameAndStatus := range groupStatus { + for _, isSet := range flagnameAndStatus { + if isSet { + // One of the flags of the group is set, mark the other ones as required + for _, fName := range strings.Split(flagList, " ") { + _ = c.MarkFlagRequired(fName) + } + } + } + } + + // If a flag that is mutually exclusive to others is present, we hide the other + // flags of that group so the shell completion does not suggest them + for flagList, flagnameAndStatus := range mutuallyExclusiveGroupStatus { + for flagName, isSet := range flagnameAndStatus { + if isSet { + // One of the flags of the mutually exclusive group is set, mark the other ones as hidden + // Don't mark the flag that is already set as hidden because it may be an + // array or slice flag and therefore must continue being suggested + for _, fName := range strings.Split(flagList, " ") { + if fName != flagName { + flag := c.Flags().Lookup(fName) + flag.Hidden = true + } + } + } + } + } +}