Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Field stays red when an invalid catalog number is entered in the create interactions dialog #4915

Open
emenslin opened this issue May 13, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
1 - Bug Incorrect behavior of the product 2 - Interactions Issues that are related to interactions, including loans, exchanges, gifts, and more

Comments

@emenslin
Copy link
Collaborator

Describe the bug
When trying to create an interaction by entering catalog numbers if you enter an invalid catalog number the field will stay red even if you change it.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Go to interactions
  2. Choose any interaction with the preparations dialog (e.g. loan)
  3. Click on by entering catalog number
  4. Add an invalid catalog number
  5. See the field turns red
  6. Delete that and enter valid catalog numbers
  7. See the field stays red

Expected behavior
The field should turn back to gray once the invalid number has been removed

Screenshots

f3OahRrNa1.mp4

Please, also fill out the following information manually:

  • OS: Windows 11
  • Browser: Chrome
  • Specify 7 Version: edge
  • Database Name: lsumzmammals9823
  • Collection name: mammals
  • User Name: spadmin
@emenslin emenslin added 1 - Bug Incorrect behavior of the product 2 - Interactions Issues that are related to interactions, including loans, exchanges, gifts, and more labels May 13, 2024
@lexiclevenger
Copy link
Collaborator

This might be related to #4851

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1 - Bug Incorrect behavior of the product 2 - Interactions Issues that are related to interactions, including loans, exchanges, gifts, and more
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants