understanding the audit error (cuda/rocm variants) #42786
-
in #42785, the audit is failing, and I don't really understand how to fix it.
Should I add 2 variants cuda and rocm to tandem? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
Thomas-Ulrich
Feb 22, 2024
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
The PR is adding directives in depends_on("mpich+cuda", when="+cuda ^[virtuals=mpi] mpich") If the Does the package currently behave as you expect during concretization? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Thanks, I forgot to derive tandem of CudaPackage and ROCmPackage, now it is fixed.