Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove per program timings from blockstore processor ledger replay #22370

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 8, 2022

Conversation

carllin
Copy link
Contributor

@carllin carllin commented Jan 8, 2022

Problem

New vector of error timings grows unboundedly large during ledger replay because they are never coalesced.

Summary of Changes

The cost model is never updated in ledger replay anyways, so just clear the per program timings
Fixes #

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #22370 (9e42ed7) into master (6d76db1) will decrease coverage by 0.0%.
The diff coverage is 100.0%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #22370     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage    81.0%    81.0%   -0.1%     
=========================================
  Files         551      551             
  Lines      150041   150042      +1     
=========================================
- Hits       121637   121616     -21     
- Misses      28404    28426     +22     

@carllin carllin merged commit 813006b into solana-labs:master Jan 8, 2022
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2022
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2022
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2022
…22370) (#22371)

(cherry picked from commit 813006b)

Co-authored-by: carllin <carl@solana.com>
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2022
…22370) (#22372)

(cherry picked from commit 813006b)

Co-authored-by: carllin <carl@solana.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants