4.x - Refactor FastRouteDispatcher
#2832
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This won't be a BC unless someone extended and overrode.. I'm willing to risk it haha. Looks much tidier in there now good work! |
l0gicgate
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2019
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR does refactor
\Slim\Routing\FastRouteDispatcheras there were basically some code duplicates.So I created a new method
routingResults()that tries to find routing results given an http method and a uri. The method would check the static route map as well as the variable route data.I have removed the protected method
routingResultsFromVariableRouteResults()- probably a BC that affects users?