Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should types.md cover DSSE's or in-toto attestations? #1411

Open
TomHennen opened this issue Apr 4, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Should types.md cover DSSE's or in-toto attestations? #1411

TomHennen opened this issue Apr 4, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@TomHennen
Copy link

Description

The types page doesn't cover DSSEs or in-toto attestations, should it? FWIW the usage blub suggests that page should cover all the supported types.
@TomHennen TomHennen added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 4, 2023
@haydentherapper
Copy link
Contributor

Related to #1054, the types docs are a bit out of date!

@bobcallaway
Copy link
Member

yes, we should definitely fix up the docs on this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@bobcallaway @TomHennen @haydentherapper