Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Donation of Ruby implementation #50

Open
haydentherapper opened this issue Apr 29, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by sigstore/community#441
Open

Donation of Ruby implementation #50

haydentherapper opened this issue Apr 29, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by sigstore/community#441
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@haydentherapper
Copy link

Description

@segiddins has been working on a Ruby implementation for Sigstore and has offered to donate it to the Sigstore org.

Note that the current ruby-sigstore repo is not actively maintained. I would propose that we:

  1. Archive the current repo
  2. Initiate a transfer of Samuel's repo to sigstore/sigstore-ruby (fixing the XYZ-sigstore vs sigstore-XYZ naming discrepancy in the process)
  3. Add sigstore-ruby to the community repo, with maintainers @segiddins and @woodruffw
@haydentherapper haydentherapper added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 29, 2024
@haydentherapper
Copy link
Author

@haydentherapper
Copy link
Author

TSC has approved in the May 9th call. @segiddins, I'll queue up the changes in the community repo.

haydentherapper added a commit to haydentherapper/community that referenced this issue May 13, 2024
A new implementation of the Ruby client has been implemented and will be
donated to the Sigstore org. The previous implementation is no longer
maintained, so it will be archived.

Also adds maintainers for the new repo based on offline discussion.

Closes sigstore/TSC#50

Signed-off-by: Hayden Blauzvern <hblauzvern@google.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant