Skip to content

Is a queued Sidekiq::Batch::Empty a sign that we didn't use batches corectly? #6139

Closed Answered by mperham
bmulholland asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Yeah, it's a signal someone created a batch with no jobs in it. Technically not a great idea but the Empty job is there to ensure any callbacks are fired.

Replies: 1 comment 2 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
@bmulholland
Comment options

@bmulholland
Comment options

Answer selected by bmulholland
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants