test(touch): add coverage for -d option #925
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
No change to production logic.
We never had coverage for `touch({'-d': ...})`, so this adds test
coverage. This also updates documentation to clarify the parameter
should be an instance of the `Date` type.
Test: `handles date argument` case
nfischer
force-pushed
the
test-touch-date
branch
from
df7de8d
to
e1fb25a
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #925 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.26% 97.26%
=======================================
Files 34 34
Lines 1281 1281
=======================================
Hits 1246 1246
Misses 35 35
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
This was covered by some |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No change to production logic.
We never had coverage for
touch({'-d': ...}), so this adds testcoverage. This also updates documentation to clarify the parameter
should be an instance of the
Datetype.Test:
handles date argumentcase