New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MAINT: prepare for SciPy 1.8.0rc4 #15479
MAINT: prepare for SciPy 1.8.0rc4 #15479
Conversation
* FIX: add G77 wrappers to PROPACK build * BLD: point PROPACK to fork branch temporarily * FIX: linting and setup.py fixes * BLD: only use G77 PROPACK wrappers if needs_g77_abi_wrapper * FIX: _is_32bit() logical error fix; compile without optimizations for 32 bit to solve some problems * FIX: lapack info clobber removed * BLD: back to scipy propack; adjustments for 32-bit build * BLD: update submodule to newest PROPACK revision * BLD: drop ilp64 support * MAINT: update to latest PROPACK main
Things I still plan to check here:
For remaining failures on conda-forge:
|
* `test_propack.py` should now skip all tests when `USE_PROPACK` is not set
This does what I want now re: PROPACK skipping. I double checked the diff here--looks right to me. If CI passes, I will merge and proceed with the |
Ok, two timeouts in CI are just the usual for this maintenance branch, so let's merge and hope we don't need a fifth rc. |
This is the patch I may need to "mimic" for our wheels: MacPython/numpy-wheels#149 |
well, the Azure MacOS jobs seem to be passing.. so maybe SciPy is "ok" for this for now... |
So the mechanism is now working, but I'm now wondering if the environment variable shouldn't be called |
more encouragement to fix the problem and delete the variable entirely I suppose |
backport the two merged PRs with a backport label
this needs to fix the remaining conda-forge PROPACK issues
@mckib2 I don't see a submodule change here? was the maintenance branch already ahead of
main
in that regard? Not sure I fully trust current submodule settings/situation, so good to double check we have the right submodule commit in use here (seems to be the latest one you can get locally).cc @h-vetinari
I'm still slightly confused about how PROPACK related issues could remain at this point--my objective was to turn off (skip) all propack related tests in rc3 with the env variable--I still think some are not getting skipped properly as I noted in the rc3 backport PR