Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improve consistency in CLI options #1838

Open
Stranger6667 opened this issue Oct 15, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Improve consistency in CLI options #1838

Stranger6667 opened this issue Oct 15, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
Component: CLI Command line interface Status: Needs Design Issue requires more design work Type: Breaking Change Introduces changes incompatible with previous versions Type: Meta Planning releases and other higher-level management tasks UX: Usability Enhances user experience

Comments

@Stranger6667
Copy link
Member

Stranger6667 commented Oct 15, 2023 •
edited

I think naming for some options could be improved so their meaning is more evident. Specifically, ones prefixed with --hypothesis.

Also, the --checks CLI option is inconsistent with the Python tests behavior - it runs just the default check, but maybe we need to run all of them by default.
@Stranger6667 Stranger6667 added Type: Meta Planning releases and other higher-level management tasks Type: Breaking Change Introduces changes incompatible with previous versions UX: Usability Enhances user experience Component: CLI Command line interface Status: Needs Design Issue requires more design work labels Oct 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Component: CLI Command line interface Status: Needs Design Issue requires more design work Type: Breaking Change Introduces changes incompatible with previous versions Type: Meta Planning releases and other higher-level management tasks UX: Usability Enhances user experience
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Stranger6667