New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: test coverage improvement #240
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Codecov ReportBase: 98.50% // Head: 99.57% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #240 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 98.50% 99.57% +1.06%
==========================================
Files 16 16
Lines 1871 1871
==========================================
+ Hits 1843 1863 +20
+ Misses 26 8 -18
+ Partials 2 0 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
I removed the parallel execution when you use a custom rand seed ;) |
I noticed that some functions and function aliases weren't being completely covered by the tests, so I decided to create and improve some tests.
I decided to separate by commits instead of PRs to not spam the repository.
I'm not sure if I chose the best approach in each test, so I'm willing to change and learn more :)