Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PROPOSAL] Raise the minimum Saber LP fee from 0.001% (0.1bp) to 0.01% (1bp) across all pools #19

Open
benlvb opened this issue Apr 10, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
proposal Governance proposals

Comments

@benlvb
Copy link

benlvb commented Apr 10, 2023

Summary

The Meteora team would like to propose the raise of the minimum Saber LP Fee from 0.001% (0.1bp) to 0.01% (1bp) across all pools.

Motivation

Currently, the minimum fees for pools are set at a very low 0.001% fee which is almost close to no fees, in a bid to facilitate volume. However, this is not a long-term model as it delivers almost no value to both Saber and liquidity providers of pools that have 0.001% fees.

In order to build a sustainable protocol, liquidity providers need to earn a sustainable yield to be incentivized to continue to provide liquidity and facilitate TVL and volume on Saber.

Here is a comparison of 0.001% fees vs 0.01% fees:
At 0.001% fees (based on current TVL and 24h volume), APY of USDT-USDC (1,939,171 TVL and 2,015,885 24H volume): 0.379%

At 0.01% fees (assuming volume remains consistent after fee raise), APY of USDT-USDC: 3.79%
With the new APY numbers, it is much more attractive and sustainable for LPs to deposit their liquidity in these pools instead of elsewhere.

A minimum swap fee of 0.01% is still very competitive compared to the average swap fees of other DEXes and CEXes.

Actions

Raising the minimum swap fees to 0.01% across all pools will definitely boost the value to users providing liquidity and Saber. By charging sustainable fees, we can help kick-start a healthier Solana ecosystem where protocols can support themselves and focus their efforts on building technology.

@benlvb benlvb added the proposal Governance proposals label Apr 10, 2023
@aperire
Copy link
Contributor

aperire commented Apr 20, 2023

This is a reasonable proposal however the LPs mostly depend on ve rewards rather than swap fees.

Also, what would be the motivation for Meteora to create a proposal on Saber?

@macalinao
Copy link
Member

This is a reasonable proposal however the LPs mostly depend on ve rewards rather than swap fees.

Also, what would be the motivation for Meteora to create a proposal on Saber?

There is an argument that having all AMMs share the same price would end up boosting each AMM's profits-- this would be a good idea if everyone else does it.

@c2yptic
Copy link

c2yptic commented Oct 1, 2023

The vote passed - https://tribeca.so/gov/sbr/proposals/46

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
proposal Governance proposals
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants