Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release a 1.0 version #94

Closed
obsgolem opened this issue Sep 2, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Release a 1.0 version #94

obsgolem opened this issue Sep 2, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@obsgolem
Copy link
Contributor

obsgolem commented Sep 2, 2021

This library appears to be the de-facto standard for complex numbers. Downstreams include ndarray and nalgebra. I just ran into an issue where ndarray is using an older version of approx, where if you turned on its num-complex feature it tried to use an older version of num-complex. If you aren't planning on making breaking changes then it would be nice if you could bump to a 1.0 version so that feature additions don't require upstreams to bump their versions. See also brendanzab/approx#70.

@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Sep 3, 2021

Just as approx cited num-complex, I must cite our public dependencies as well. It's uncertain about num-traits (which I also control), but rand does seem like it will eventually want to update to 0.9 and later.

@cuviper cuviper closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants