You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This library appears to be the de-facto standard for complex numbers. Downstreams include ndarray and nalgebra. I just ran into an issue where ndarray is using an older version of approx, where if you turned on its num-complex feature it tried to use an older version of num-complex. If you aren't planning on making breaking changes then it would be nice if you could bump to a 1.0 version so that feature additions don't require upstreams to bump their versions. See also brendanzab/approx#70.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just as approx cited num-complex, I must cite our public dependencies as well. It's uncertain about num-traits (which I also control), but rand does seem like it will eventually want to update to 0.9 and later.
This library appears to be the de-facto standard for complex numbers. Downstreams include ndarray and nalgebra. I just ran into an issue where ndarray is using an older version of approx, where if you turned on its num-complex feature it tried to use an older version of num-complex. If you aren't planning on making breaking changes then it would be nice if you could bump to a 1.0 version so that feature additions don't require upstreams to bump their versions. See also brendanzab/approx#70.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: