Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hashbrown fails to compile on avr architectures because ahash does not yet support atomic-polyfill #356

Closed
mutantbob opened this issue Aug 25, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #357

Comments

@mutantbob
Copy link

Even after patching hashbrown with #353 , AVR applications using hashbrown fail to compile because ahash fails:

error[E0432]: unresolved import `core::sync::atomic::AtomicUsize`
  --> /home/thoth/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/ahash-0.7.6/src/random_state.rs:33:26
   |
33 | use core::sync::atomic::{AtomicUsize, Ordering};
   |                          ^^^^^^^^^^^ no `AtomicUsize` in `sync::atomic`

tkaitchuck/aHash#124 would solve this issue, but for the 0.8.0 release of ahash.

Attempting to switch hashbrown to the 0.8 release of ahash results in a cascade of errors:

error[E0599]: the function or associated item `default` exists for struct `HashMap<K, V>`, but its trait bounds were not satisfied
    --> /home/thoth/vendor/hashbrown/src/map.rs:308:15
     |
188  | pub struct HashMap<K, V, S = DefaultHashBuilder, A: Allocator + Clone = Global> {
     | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     | |
     | function or associated item `default` not found for this struct
     | doesn't satisfy `HashMap<K, V>: Default`
...
308  |         Self::default()
     |               ^^^^^^^ function or associated item cannot be called on `HashMap<K, V>` due to unsatisfied trait bounds
     |
    ::: /home/thoth/vendor/aHash/src/random_state.rs:202:1
     |
202  | pub struct RandomState {
     | ---------------------- doesn't satisfy `RandomState: Default`
     |
note: trait bound `RandomState: Default` was not satisfied
    --> /home/thoth/vendor/hashbrown/src/map.rs:2117:8
     |
2115 | impl<K, V, S, A> Default for HashMap<K, V, S, A>
     |                  -------     -------------------
2116 | where
2117 |     S: Default,
     |        ^^^^^^^ unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
     = help: items from traits can only be used if the trait is implemented and in scope
     = note: the following trait defines an item `default`, perhaps you need to implement it:
             candidate #1: `Default`

error[E0599]: no function or associated item named `default` found for struct `RandomState` in the current scope
   --> /home/thoth/vendor/hashbrown/src/map.rs:326:70
    |
326 |         Self::with_capacity_and_hasher(capacity, DefaultHashBuilder::default())
    |                                                                      ^^^^^^^ function or associated item not found in `RandomState`

error[E0599]: no function or associated item named `default` found for struct `RandomState` in the current scope
   --> /home/thoth/vendor/hashbrown/src/map.rs:338:50
    |
338 |         Self::with_hasher_in(DefaultHashBuilder::default(), alloc)
    |                                                  ^^^^^^^ function or associated item not found in `RandomState`

error[E0599]: no function or associated item named `default` found for struct `RandomState` in the current scope
   --> /home/thoth/vendor/hashbrown/src/map.rs:347:73
    |
347 |         Self::with_capacity_and_hasher_in(capacity, DefaultHashBuilder::default(), alloc)
    |                                                                         ^^^^^^^ function or associated item not found in `RandomState`

error[E0277]: the trait bound `RandomState: Default` is not satisfied
    --> /home/thoth/vendor/hashbrown/src/map.rs:2189:25
     |
2189 |         arr.into_iter().collect()
     |                         ^^^^^^^ the trait `Default` is not implemented for `RandomState`
     |
     = help: the trait `FromIterator<(K, V)>` is implemented for `HashMap<K, V, S, A>`
note: required because of the requirements on the impl of `FromIterator<(K, V)>` for `HashMap<K, V, RandomState, A>`
    --> /home/thoth/vendor/hashbrown/src/map.rs:6333:18
     |
6333 | impl<K, V, S, A> FromIterator<(K, V)> for HashMap<K, V, S, A>
     |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
note: required by a bound in `collect`
    --> /home/thoth/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-2022-07-10-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/iter/traits/iterator.rs:1832:19
     |
1832 |     fn collect<B: FromIterator<Self::Item>>(self) -> B
     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `collect`

error[E0277]: the trait bound `RandomState: Default` is not satisfied
    --> /home/thoth/vendor/hashbrown/src/set.rs:1220:25
     |
1220 |         arr.into_iter().collect()
     |                         ^^^^^^^ the trait `Default` is not implemented for `RandomState`
     |
     = help: the trait `FromIterator<T>` is implemented for `HashSet<T, S, A>`
note: required because of the requirements on the impl of `FromIterator<T>` for `HashSet<T, RandomState, A>`
    --> /home/thoth/vendor/hashbrown/src/set.rs:1189:15
     |
1189 | impl<T, S, A> FromIterator<T> for HashSet<T, S, A>
     |               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
note: required by a bound in `collect`
    --> /home/thoth/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-2022-07-10-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/iter/traits/iterator.rs:1832:19
     |
1832 |     fn collect<B: FromIterator<Self::Item>>(self) -> B
     |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `collect`

I can imagine two ways forward:

  1. modify hashbrown to support ahash 0.8.0 and wait for fix AVR support by using atomic-polyfill tkaitchuck/aHash#124 to be merged
  2. ask ahash to release a patch version of 0.7 (0.7.7?) that solves its atomic-polyfill problem and depend on that ( I have a branch for that tkaitchuck/aHash@master...mutantbob:aHash:atomic-polyfill0.7.6 but have not made a separate pull request because I already have an 0.8.0 pull request)
@Amanieu
Copy link
Member

Amanieu commented Sep 1, 2022

Fixed by #357.

@bors bors closed this as completed in ea7c3ba Sep 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants