Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rebuild after modifying environment variables that the C compiler reads #906

Open
madsmtm opened this issue Nov 23, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@madsmtm
Copy link
Contributor

madsmtm commented Nov 23, 2023

Cargo has the ability to specify that a build script depends on specific environment variables using cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=NAME, but no such mechanism exist for C compilers (that I know of).

This means that when you update an environment variable that your C compiler reads, you have to run cargo clean before the change takes effect. It would be nice if cc could prevent this by outputting a list of known variables that the C compiler it is about to invoke may read.

A list of the major ones I've found so far in Clang/LLVM (see also their limited docs about it):

  • SDKROOT on Apple targets
  • VCINSTALLDIR / VCToolsInstallDir on Windows
  • INCLUDE / CPATH / C_INCLUDE_PATH / C_PLUS_INCLUDE_PATH / OBJC_INCLUDE_PATH / OBJCPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH
  • MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET / IPHONEOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET / TVOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET / WATCHOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET on Apple targets

Note that some of these may need to be handled by rustc/cargo itself.

Clang/LLVM read a bunch more, but they're mostly for debugging, or for stuff like setting up the terminal width, so I don't think those are applicable.

Additionally, C compilers usually rely on a few fundamental ones like PATH, PWD and PATHEXT on Windows that I would honestly expect cargo to handle, though I get why it may be difficult to do right.

@madsmtm madsmtm changed the title Rebuild after modifyng environment variables that C compilers read Rebuild after modifying environment variables that the C compiler reads Nov 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant