Add multipeek method #435
Merged
Add multipeek method #435
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I wonder if we have a "standard" way of dealing with free functions vs methods. I think we could accept this PR, but it may be worth looking into bringing all the free functions vs methods in line (e.g. by always implementing the method and having the free function call it). There may be obstacles regarding this idea, though. |
|
Huh, I'm surprised that there isn't parity between the free functions and methods. bors r+ |
Build succeeded |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds a
multipeekmethod to theItertoolstrait as a more convenient way to use themultipeekfunction.