You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
But I think that the field should list all licensed used in the package and therefore it should be:
GPL-2.0 AND Ruby AND BSD-3-Clause AND CC-BY-2.5 and OFL-1.1-RFN
Where the
GPL-2.0 AND Ruby comes from the LICENSE.rdoc file,
BSD-3-Clause is specified in lib/rdoc/generator/darkfish.rb
CC-BY-2.5 should be the silk icon set license
OFL-1.1-RFN is from lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/css/fonts.css
The LEGAL.rdoc also mentions some test file which follows Perl licensing, however this code is not shipped in resulting packages, so it probably does not qualifies.
BTW the GPL-2.0 is also questionable, because Ruby itself was relicensed quite some time ago, but the RDoc LICENSE file still states GPL-2.0. It might be fine as it is. Not sure.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On top of #921, I'd like to ask if the .gemspec license field can be updated. Currently, it says just
Ruby
:rdoc/rdoc.gemspec
Line 29 in d12272b
But I think that the field should list all licensed used in the package and therefore it should be:
GPL-2.0 AND Ruby AND BSD-3-Clause AND CC-BY-2.5 and OFL-1.1-RFN
Where the
GPL-2.0 AND Ruby
comes from theLICENSE.rdoc
file,BSD-3-Clause
is specified inlib/rdoc/generator/darkfish.rb
CC-BY-2.5
should be the silk icon set licenseOFL-1.1-RFN
is fromlib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/css/fonts.css
The
LEGAL.rdoc
also mentions some test file which follows Perl licensing, however this code is not shipped in resulting packages, so it probably does not qualifies.BTW the
GPL-2.0
is also questionable, because Ruby itself was relicensed quite some time ago, but the RDoc LICENSE file still statesGPL-2.0
. It might be fine as it is. Not sure.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: