Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sasl fix #281

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 8, 2017
Merged

Sasl fix #281

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 8, 2017

Conversation

tmaher
Copy link
Collaborator

@tmaher tmaher commented Aug 26, 2016

@syskill - I'm terribly sorry for not simply merging #277. This gem uses Rubocop for some basic style & correctness checks. It reasonably wants us to name MaxSaslChallenges like a constant.

@jch - This is pretty minor. sasl.rb & connection.rb are the only places in the repo to reference MaxSaslChallenges, so a rename looks safe. Assuming no CI problems or objections, I'm going to wait a day or two then merge this.

@jch
Copy link
Member

jch commented Aug 26, 2016

@tmaher thanks for picking this up again.

@syskill or @tmaher is there a good way to integration test this?

@vlymar
Copy link

vlymar commented Jan 30, 2017

I recently bumped into this issue while implementing LDAP with sasl via the https://github.com/intridea/omniauth-ldap gem.

Any chance we can get this merged in? How can I help?

@jch jch merged commit 8031bf5 into master Feb 8, 2017
@jch jch deleted the sasl-fix branch February 8, 2017 19:08
@jch
Copy link
Member

jch commented Feb 8, 2017

Thanks all. Not bumping the gem until a few other PRs are merged.

jsonn pushed a commit to jsonn/pkgsrc that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2017
=== Net::LDAP 0.16.0

* Sasl fix {#281}[ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap#281]
* enable TLS hostname validation {#279}[ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap#279]
* update rubocop to 0.42.0 {#278}[ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap#278]
This was referenced Jan 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants