Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Ruby 2.7's pattern matching for Style/ConditionalAssignment #9948

Conversation

koic
Copy link
Member

@koic koic commented Jul 23, 2021

This PR supports Ruby 2.7's pattern matching for Style/ConditionalAssignment.

This Style/IdenticalConditionalBranches cop is detecting for if and case.
Therefore, I think about detecting case-match with the cop instead of a new cop.


Before submitting the PR make sure the following are checked:

  • The PR relates to only one subject with a clear title and description in grammatically correct, complete sentences.
  • Wrote good commit messages.
  • Commit message starts with [Fix #issue-number] (if the related issue exists).
  • Feature branch is up-to-date with master (if not - rebase it).
  • Squashed related commits together.
  • Added tests.
  • Ran bundle exec rake default. It executes all tests and runs RuboCop on its own code.
  • Added an entry (file) to the changelog folder named {change_type}_{change_description}.md if the new code introduces user-observable changes. See changelog entry format for details.

This PR supports Ruby 2.7's pattern matching for `Style/ConditionalAssignment`.

This `Style/IdenticalConditionalBranches` cop is detecting for `if` and `case`.
Therefore, I think about detecting `case-match` with the cop instead of a new cop.
@bbatsov bbatsov merged commit 39fcf1c into rubocop:master Jul 27, 2021
@bbatsov
Copy link
Collaborator

bbatsov commented Jul 27, 2021

Thanks!

@koic koic deleted the support_pattern_matching_for_style_conditional_assignment branch July 27, 2021 17:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants