Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should this gem be independent from rubocop-capybara? #1570

Closed
Aqualon opened this issue Jan 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Should this gem be independent from rubocop-capybara? #1570

Aqualon opened this issue Jan 24, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@Aqualon
Copy link

Aqualon commented Jan 24, 2023

Hi, we use rspec in multiple of our projects and none of it uses capybara. Also the downloads of rspec on rubygems.org are much higher than for capybara, so I assume we are not the only ones.

I'd prefer to have only rubocop-rspec without the rubocop-capybara dependency. Also capybara can be used outside of rspec, so maybe it makes sense to treat them as independent from each other and people using capybara could add rubocop-capybara manually?

@pirj
Copy link
Member

pirj commented Jan 24, 2023

We intend to remove the dependency on rubocop-capybara in the next major release, 3.0, Real Soon™.
See #1519 and #1440 for details.
For SemVer reasons, we can't just remove all capybara cops in a minor release. Sorry for the inconvenience.

@pirj pirj closed this as completed Jan 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants