Cop idea: Excluding multi-line statements from RSpec/ExampleLength inspection

[j-miyake]

RSpec/ExampleLength detects this code as an offense.

it do
  expect(object).to(
    have_received(:some_method).with(
      value1,
      value2,
      value3,
      value4,
      keyword_arg1: value5,
      keyword_arg2: value6
    )
  )
end

Modifying the code like the below solves the offense, but I feel this one is less readable than the original one. (Especially when the name of each argument varies a lot.)

it do
  expect(object).to(
    have_received(:some_method).with(
      value1, value2, value3, value4,
      keyword_arg1: value5,
      keyword_arg2: value6
    )
  )
end

Should we add another option, or is there any way to avoid the offense by some configuration?

In the discussion where CountAsOne was introduced, this opinion makes sense to me.

I thought that maybe what we really want is to limit the number of top-level statements inside an example.
#1125

[pirj]

What about a 100-lines long:

expect(object).to have_received(:some_method).with(
  be_present,
  match(include(have_attributes(
   # lengthly list of 30 lines

Would such a declarative example still count as short?

[j-miyake]

Your point is valid. Then it seems better to disable the cop for each test case by case rather than adding another feature to the cop, right? (Offenses like above may be considered a signal of the need for refactoring, though.)

[pirj]

I'm open to consider introduction of an option given an example that would not contribute to the example readability while breaking the default line length constraint.