Add new Rails/DotSeparatedKeys cop
#325
Conversation
|
@koic Any interest in this? |
|
Wouldn't this better be part of rubocop-i18n: https://github.com/puppetlabs/rubocop-i18n |
|
Maybe. We have already merged another cop https://github.com/rubocop-hq/rubocop-rails/blob/master/lib/rubocop/cop/rails/short_i18n.rb I was thinking the same when noticed that gem existence, then checked it out - and or I do not understand the purpose of that gem (looking at its cops) or personally I find it useless and would prefer to have such cops as in this PR in this gem. |
| RUBY | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| it 'does not register an offense when `scope` is not a string nor a symbol' do |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You mention that "scope is not a string". But `scope is an Array or a Sybmol in the examples.
Can you add an example for a string scope?
To my personal taste,
t :record_not_found, scope: 'activerecord.errors.messages'reads better than
t scope: 'activerecord.errors.messages.record_not_found'I'll gladly suggest an amendment to the Rails Style guide.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
t :record_not_found, scope: 'activerecord.errors.messages'will already be corrected to
t 'activerecord.errors.messages.record_not_found'Or am I missing something?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
am I missing something?
Yes, an example for this case 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Updated with that change and a new test case.
fatkodima
force-pushed
the
dot_separated_keys-cop
branch
2 times, most recently
from
d473b74
to
d60f144
Compare
|
I'm sorry for the delay. Can you rebase this PR with the latest master branch? |
fatkodima
force-pushed
the
dot_separated_keys-cop
branch
from
d60f144
to
7529f53
Compare
|
@koic Rebased. |
|
Thank you! |
An implementation of https://rails.rubystyle.guide/#dot-separated-keys