Group name: COMESTU
Reviewers: Rosa Suominen, Susannan Karttunen, Henrik Reponen, Joonas Tuominen
Link to the slideset: Click here.
-
Did you get overall view of the product?
Yes. It was clearly presented. -
How was the slideset?
The slideset was good and clear. -
Was the presentation fluent? Body language? Language, quality of the speech?
The presentation was fluent. Body language was good. You could have talked a bit more calmer. Sometimes the speech was a bit too rushed but mostly it was fluent and nice. The volume of the speech was loud enough. -
Additional notes and comments
Very good mock-ups. The idea of the application is good
Link to the documentation: Click here.
Review the following parts of the documentation.
For each section / part, describe the following:
- Is all the content there?
- What was bad in the specific part, how it could be improved?
- What was good in the specific part?
Parts to review:
- introduction (=first section) + project management (=last section)
Very thorough introduction, maybe even too thorough. - use cases
Good user definitions and use case diagram. Well thought scenarios that could happen. Flowchart could've had a nicer structure. A little overwhelming as is. - system overview
Too many modules, not all high level main modules. The ones listed are well explained. - requirements, functional & non-functional
Functional requirements take into consideration everything possible. More thought into non-functional requirements. - user interface
Very nice interface sketches. The map doesn't show up very well from the dark background