Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Indexing OpenDocument and PDF files (include files in the search) #235

Open
gerdneuman opened this issue May 29, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Comments

@gerdneuman
Copy link

We're a group of 30 people who have used crabgrass on we.riseup.net for the last 3, 4 years. Really great to see that development continues now!

One missing feature that has always bugged us all the time is that uploaded LibreOffice files (e.g. meeting meetings, strategic documents and others) are not included in the search.

I think the same goes for PDF files (where pdftotext might be used).

@elijh
Copy link
Contributor

elijh commented May 29, 2015

weird! this used to work, I never noticed that it stopped working. The code is there to support this, I guess we just need to add a test to ensure it is working.

@gerdneuman
Copy link
Author

If indexing is something that can be easily fixed, can't this get a higher priority? This seems like a bug with high impact.

We have about 300 documents (meeting minutes, pdfs, etc). Crabgrass feels like a big dump of files where nothing can be find...

@gerdneuman gerdneuman changed the title Indexing OpenDocument files (include files in the search) Indexing OpenDocument and PDF files (include files in the search) Feb 15, 2016
@azul
Copy link
Contributor

azul commented Feb 15, 2016

I'll investigate why this does not work right now. Fix might take some time though because i'm in the process of upgrading crabgrass to rails 4.2 right now and the udate of the live server will take some work.

@azul azul closed this as completed in 67608cb May 29, 2019
@azul
Copy link
Contributor

azul commented May 29, 2019

We're mostly tracking issues on gitlab these days. So the commit that closed htis issue was actually meant to close this issue

@azul azul reopened this May 29, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants