Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump dependency versions for Eclipse 2022-09 #657

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 30, 2022

Conversation

ctubbsii
Copy link
Member

  • Bump JDT Core to 3.31.0
  • Bump transitive dependencies for JDT Core using src/build/find-transitive-eclipse-updates.sh script, but leave osgi at 8.1.0 and not 8.0.1 (apparently, Eclipse still depends on 8.0, but 8.1 works fine). Also note that the JDT Core POM model is incorrect and says 4.0, when it should be 4.0.0. This caused a parse error running this script, but was trivial to patch the POM temporarily to get the script to work
  • Update Jackson to latest patch release
  • Update JUnit to altest
  • Update version table for website and CHANGELOG

* Bump JDT Core to 3.31.0
* Bump transitive dependencies for JDT Core using
  src/build/find-transitive-eclipse-updates.sh script, but leave osgi at
  8.1.0 and not 8.0.1 (apparently, Eclipse still depends on 8.0, but 8.1
  works fine). Also note that the JDT Core POM model is incorrect and
  says 4.0, when it should be 4.0.0. This caused a parse error running
  this script, but was trivial to patch the POM temporarily to get the
  script to work
* Update Jackson to latest patch release
* Update JUnit to altest
* Update version table for website and CHANGELOG
@ctubbsii ctubbsii added this to the 2.21.0 milestone Sep 30, 2022
@ctubbsii ctubbsii self-assigned this Sep 30, 2022
@ctubbsii ctubbsii merged commit a422b62 into revelc:main Sep 30, 2022
@ctubbsii ctubbsii deleted the bump-to-eclipse-2022-09 branch September 30, 2022 20:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant