Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider forking/merging strategy for BoringSSL test runner #44

Open
blakebyrnes opened this issue Apr 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Consider forking/merging strategy for BoringSSL test runner #44

blakebyrnes opened this issue Apr 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
help wanted Calling for community PR/volunteer

Comments

@blakebyrnes
Copy link
Contributor

BoringSSL has a fork of golang's tls implementation as well that it uses as a runner for it's test suite. There are a number of potential holes in uTls that could be plugged with implementations already written in this wrapper (certificate compression, channel ids, upcoming quic, etc). I'm still trying to understand exactly how this could work (still poking through utls to understand it), but it seems like a promising option to keep in sync as tls signatures change.

@blakebyrnes
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blakebyrnes blakebyrnes changed the title Consider forking/merging strategy for BoringSsl test runner Consider forking/merging strategy for BoringSSL test runner Apr 9, 2020
@sergeyfrolov
Copy link
Member

BoringSSL test runner does seem like a useful addition to uTLS.

@sergeyfrolov sergeyfrolov added the help wanted Calling for community PR/volunteer label Apr 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Calling for community PR/volunteer
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants