Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Development: tune development process #133

Open
agjohnson opened this issue Jul 14, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Development: tune development process #133

agjohnson opened this issue Jul 14, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
Improvement Minor improvement to code Needed: design decision A core team decision is required

Comments

@agjohnson
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, there is a singular development process for CSS, JS, and authoring site content, using Webpack. This works great if you are set up to work on everything already. If you only care about authoring content, and don't need to touch CSS or JS, or don't have the proper Node base environment, then there could potentially be some conflict here.

For now, I'd much prefer to have a singular method of contributing here. Webpack will always be used for doing development on CSS + JS, and so I prefer to also use it to build and serve Pelican content.

There are a few options here, but I'd rather not explore them yet. Just noting this for now and we can continue to tweak the process if necessary.

Raised in #132

@agjohnson agjohnson added Improvement Minor improvement to code Needed: design decision A core team decision is required labels Jul 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Improvement Minor improvement to code Needed: design decision A core team decision is required
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant