Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add key hook parts to Schedulers.onHandleError #3039

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2022

Conversation

simonbasle
Copy link
Member

This commit adds the ability to define keyed hook parts for the hook
Schedulers.onHandleError.

The existing API now defines an "anonymous part", allowing to call the
API without a specific key while still preserving parts that were set
with their own keys.

A mean of resetting only a specific part is also introduced.

Fixes #3038.

This commit adds the ability to define keyed hook parts for the hook
Schedulers.onHandleError.

The existing API now defines an "anonymous part", allowing to call the
API without a specific key while still preserving parts that were set
with their own keys.

A mean of resetting only a specific part is also introduced.

Fixes #3038.
@simonbasle simonbasle requested a review from a team as a code owner May 10, 2022 17:20
@simonbasle simonbasle added this to the 3.4.19 milestone May 10, 2022
@simonbasle simonbasle added the type/enhancement A general enhancement label May 10, 2022
@simonbasle simonbasle self-assigned this May 10, 2022
@simonbasle simonbasle requested a review from a team May 10, 2022 17:20
@simonbasle simonbasle merged commit f9a1e3f into 3.4.x May 17, 2022
@reactorbot
Copy link

@simonbasle this PR seems to have been merged on a maintenance branch, please ensure the change is merge-forwarded to intermediate maintenance branches and up to main 🙇

simonbasle added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
@simonbasle simonbasle deleted the 3038-addHookPartsToOnHandleError branch May 17, 2022 13:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants