Removed reference to delayUntilOther #1473
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
DelayUntilOther doesn't exist anymore. I also rewrote the delayUntil description. Actually a person looking for this is faced with the question "I want to execute a mono with my value as an input but ignore its return value and instead pass the current value downstream". However, I'm not sure how to express this succinctly.
|
@fletchgqc Please sign the Contributor License Agreement! Click here to manually synchronize the status of this Pull Request. See the FAQ for frequently asked questions. |
|
The method in question was removed in 7cc4d54#diff-10ade4c0edd46bfe32858ea45d8c0972. |
|
@fletchgqc Thank you for signing the Contributor License Agreement! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DelayUntilOther doesn't exist anymore. I also rewrote the delayUntil description. Actually a person looking for this is faced with the question "I want to execute a mono with my value as an input but ignore its return value and instead pass the current value downstream". However, I'm not sure how to express this succinctly.