Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Throw specific BlockingOperationError instead of Error #65

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 30, 2019

Conversation

bhchandra
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #64.

@pivotal-issuemaster
Copy link

@bhchandra Please sign the Contributor License Agreement!

Click here to manually synchronize the status of this Pull Request.

See the FAQ for frequently asked questions.

@pivotal-issuemaster
Copy link

@bhchandra Thank you for signing the Contributor License Agreement!

@bsideup bsideup added this to the next milestone Oct 28, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@bsideup bsideup left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! 👍 I requested a couple of changes (one legal, another one is just for convenience), good to go once fixed 🎉

docs/customization.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@bhchandra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bsideup thank you for reviewing.

Just want to point out that the Readme should also need to be changed.

image

Shall I convert java.lang.Error to reactor.blockhound.BlockingOperationError ?

@bsideup
Copy link
Contributor

bsideup commented Oct 29, 2019

@bhchandra good catch! Yes, please change the class in README too 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@bsideup bsideup left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@bsideup bsideup merged commit eca8ed5 into reactor:master Oct 30, 2019
@bsideup
Copy link
Contributor

bsideup commented Oct 30, 2019

@bhchandra merged 🎉 thank you! 👍

bsideup added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2019
To make it easier to maintain the tests and not rely on any string assertions,
we should use the `BlockingOperationError` type that was introduced in #65
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BlockHound should use specific Error sub-type
3 participants