Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature: Add equality comparer to MRUCache, now uses ValueTuple #344

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 20, 2019

Conversation

glennawatson
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@glennawatson glennawatson requested a review from a team June 20, 2019 08:33
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 20, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #344 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 75%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #344      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   70.68%   70.69%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files          65       65              
  Lines        3544     3545       +1     
  Branches      316      317       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         2505     2506       +1     
  Misses        997      997              
  Partials       42       42
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/Splat/MemoizingMRUCache.cs 59.25% <75%> (+0.5%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a7aa168...d77e0ba. Read the comment docs.

@glennawatson glennawatson merged commit 161eeda into master Jun 20, 2019
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the glennawatson-add-equality-comparer-mru branch June 20, 2019 08:45
@lock lock bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 18, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant