Rename master branch to main.

[ioquatix]

I don't have a personal stake in this, but as a matter of consistency I've been renaming all my projects to use main rather than master.

Can we adopt this as a general policy for the rack organisation?

cc @tenderlove @jeremyevans

[jeremyevans]

I don't think the benefits are greater than the costs, but I don't object.

[ioquatix]

Okay, it is done.

[tenderlove]

I'm happy about this, but in the future please ping me first? This discussion has only been up for less than 24hrs.

[ioquatix]

Sorry. Are you happy we do this for other projects under the rack org?

[matthewd]

@ioquatix I think most of the other repositories are functionally maintained by other people? I too would prefer the consistency, but probably worth looping them in first.

[ioquatix]

That makes total sense.

[tenderlove]

Agree with @matthewd, I also like the consistency, but definitely loop them in.

[ioquatix]

Any objections to moving https://github.com/rack/rack-contrib master -> main?

[ioquatix]

Okay, done.

[ioquatix]

Any objections to moving https://github.com/rack/rack-test master -> main?

[ioquatix]

Okay, done.

[ioquatix]

I've opened a discussion on rack-attack which has active maintainers: rack/rack-attack#571

[ioquatix]

Okay, done.