Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sankey should include solar and wind with battery #4240

Open
MartLubben opened this issue Apr 11, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Sankey should include solar and wind with battery #4240

MartLubben opened this issue Apr 11, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@MartLubben
Copy link
Contributor

image

"Zon op land met batterijsysteem" and "Op land met batterijsysteem" are not included in the Sankey.

@MartLubben
Copy link
Contributor Author

When al turbines include batteries, it does not show in the sankey als wind. Same is true for solar fields.

image

@mabijkerk
Copy link
Member

Thanks for this @MartLubben, well-spotted!

@kaskranenburgQ
Copy link
Contributor

I have examined the issue. I would expect that these energy flows would be implemented in the conversion_from_solar_electricity_to_electricity & conversion_from_wind_electricity_to_electricity queries, both the nodes for solar (energy_battery_solar_electricity) and wind (energy_battery_wind_electrcity) with batteries fall under the electricity_production group. However, these queries filter based on solar_radiation_input_conversion and wind_input_conversion respectively.
Both these nodes do not convert wind or solar to electricity since this conversion happens in energy_battery_solar_pv_solar_radiation (for solar) and energy_battery_wind_turbine_inland (for wind).

I see 2 options to fix this issue:

  1. Remove the group 'electricity production' from the energy_battery_xxx_electricity nodes and place them on the nodes where the conversion takes place.
  2. Create a new query, in which the electricy_output of the nodes is taken. This is than added to the conversion_from_xxx_to_electricity nodes.

@mabijkerk Do you agree? And which option would have your preference?

@mabijkerk
Copy link
Member

I think the reason why the energy_battery_{SOURCE}_electricity nodes have the group electricity_production is that we want the main model to view the always on battery parks as a single system i.e. a black box, even though we model all the components. That is also why the nodes have the group merit_order_csv_include and the nodes energy_battery_{PRODUCER} have the group merit_order_csv_exclude.

As becomes clear through this issue, this approach has its downsides. Another downside is that when we write queries using merit_order attributes, the exceptions created by the groups are not taken into account, because the merit order attributes are placed on the energy_battery_{PRODUCER} nodes.

I think this is a relevant issue for the implementation of hybrid offshore wind as well. I suggest we discuss this issue in a short meeting for that project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants