Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BE] Do not package caffe2 in wheel #87986

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

malfet
Copy link
Contributor

@malfet malfet commented Oct 28, 2022

If PyTorch is build without caffe2 integration, do not package unusable
.py files/headers

Same is true about functorch - don't package it unless building with functorch (although, I wonder if we should remove this option at some point in the future)

Followup after pytorch/builder#1181

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 28, 2022

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/87986

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit d7ce594:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the topic: not user facing topic category label Oct 28, 2022
@malfet malfet requested a review from a team October 28, 2022 14:43
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 28, 2022
If PyTorch is build without caffe2 integration, do not package unusable
.py files/headers

Followup after pytorch/builder#1181
@malfet malfet force-pushed the malfet/do-not-package-caffe2 branch from a41e9be to d763e08 Compare October 29, 2022 04:42
`cmake_cache_vars` does not exist everywhere, create global function to
take care of it
@malfet malfet force-pushed the malfet/do-not-package-caffe2 branch from d763e08 to 4e8ae96 Compare October 29, 2022 04:46
@malfet
Copy link
Contributor Author

malfet commented Oct 29, 2022

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: The following mandatory check(s) failed (Rule superuser):

Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Why don't we do wheels, like on other platforms
@malfet malfet changed the title [BE] Do not package caffe2 package [BE] Do not package caffe2 in wheel Oct 30, 2022
@malfet
Copy link
Contributor Author

malfet commented Oct 30, 2022

@pytorchbot merge -f "This is a build only change"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

ashay added a commit to llvm/torch-mlir that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2022
Unless requested otherwise, PyTorch no longer installs most of the
header files under the caffe2 directory (see
pytorch/pytorch#87986).  This breaks our
importer code since we need to use the `MakeGuard()` function to execute
statements in the event of exceptions.

To fix this issue, this patch implements a rudimentary version of
PyTorch's ScopeGuard, where once the class variable goes out of scope,
it executes a predefined method.
kulinseth pushed a commit to kulinseth/pytorch that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2022
If PyTorch is build without caffe2 integration, do not package unusable
.py files/headers

Same is true about functorch - don't package it unless building with `functorch` (although, I wonder if we should remove this option at some point in the future)

Followup after pytorch/builder#1181

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#87986
Approved by: https://github.com/seemethere
@malfet malfet added this to the 1.13.1 milestone Dec 8, 2022
atalman pushed a commit to atalman/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2022
If PyTorch is build without caffe2 integration, do not package unusable
.py files/headers

Same is true about functorch - don't package it unless building with `functorch` (although, I wonder if we should remove this option at some point in the future)

Followup after pytorch/builder#1181

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#87986
Approved by: https://github.com/seemethere
atalman pushed a commit to atalman/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2022
If PyTorch is build without caffe2 integration, do not package unusable
.py files/headers

Same is true about functorch - don't package it unless building with `functorch` (although, I wonder if we should remove this option at some point in the future)

Followup after pytorch/builder#1181

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#87986
Approved by: https://github.com/seemethere
atalman added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2022
If PyTorch is build without caffe2 integration, do not package unusable
.py files/headers

Same is true about functorch - don't package it unless building with `functorch` (although, I wonder if we should remove this option at some point in the future)

Followup after pytorch/builder#1181

Pull Request resolved: #87986
Approved by: https://github.com/seemethere

Co-authored-by: Nikita Shulga <nshulga@meta.com>
kulinseth pushed a commit to kulinseth/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2022
If PyTorch is build without caffe2 integration, do not package unusable
.py files/headers

Same is true about functorch - don't package it unless building with `functorch` (although, I wonder if we should remove this option at some point in the future)

Followup after pytorch/builder#1181

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#87986
Approved by: https://github.com/seemethere
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged topic: not user facing topic category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants