Let overload item have a wider return type than implementation #12435
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
A wider return type can be useful if a decorator used for the overload implementation gets a more precise return type as part of a typeshed update. Closes #12434.
jhance
approved these changes
Mar 23, 2022
|
According to mypy_primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. 🤖🎉 |
JelleZijlstra
approved these changes
Mar 23, 2022
JukkaL
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2022
A wider return type can be useful if a decorator used for the overload implementation gets a more precise return type as part of a typeshed update. Closes #12434.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A wider return type can be useful if a decorator used for the overload
implementation gets a more precise return type as part of a typeshed
update.
Closes #12434.