Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix crash on ErasedType and covers_at_runtime #11924

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Jan 7, 2022
Merged

Fix crash on ErasedType and covers_at_runtime #11924

merged 5 commits into from Jan 7, 2022

Conversation

sobolevn
Copy link
Member

@sobolevn sobolevn commented Jan 6, 2022

Closes #11913
Refs #11273
CC @hauntsaninja

mypy/subtypes.py Outdated
@@ -1167,6 +1167,14 @@ def restrict_subtype_away(t: Type, s: Type, *, ignore_promotions: bool = False)
def covers_at_runtime(item: Type, supertype: Type, ignore_promotions: bool) -> bool:
"""Will isinstance(item, supertype) always return True at runtime?"""
item = get_proper_type(item)
supertype = get_proper_type(supertype)
if (isinstance(item, (ErasedType, DeletedType))
or isinstance(supertype, (ErasedType, DeletedType))):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm I wonder if ErasedType instances can be nested inside unions, for example, and still cause a crash. Maybe erase_type should just propagate erased types unmodified? I don't think that DeletedType can be nested so it seems safe to handle here, though I'm not sure we need special casing for it. Did you find a use case where we encounter deleted types here, or is it here more as a defensive measure?

Copy link
Member Author

@sobolevn sobolevn Jan 6, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, good idea. I will try it!

Did you find a use case where we encounter deleted types here, or is it here more as a defensive measure?

More like a defensive programming. I will remove it, because it does not make much sense without ErasedType.

Co-authored-by: Shantanu <12621235+hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@JukkaL JukkaL left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the updates!

@JukkaL JukkaL merged commit a0f27b1 into python:master Jan 7, 2022
JukkaL pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2022
Closes #11913
Refs #11273

Co-authored-by: Shantanu <12621235+hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com>
tushar-deepsource pushed a commit to DeepSourceCorp/mypy that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2022
Closes python#11913
Refs python#11273

Co-authored-by: Shantanu <12621235+hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

INTERNAL ERROR RuntimeError in visit_erased_type with mypy 0.930
3 participants