You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We're testing a number of Docker images on Travis CI (env: DOCKER=... in .travis.yml).
We're also testing them on GitHub Actions (.github/workflows/test-docker.yml, added in #4066) and Azure Pipelines (azure-pipelines.yml, #3670).
However, the Travis builds are tested with coverage which is sent to Codecov, but GitHub Actions and Azure Pipelines do not.
To speed up builds, it would be good to enable coverage on GHA or AP so we can stop testing Docker on Travis.
I don't have a strong preference for GHA or AP. We've started using GHA for Linux, macOS and Windows testing, so AP definitely would have more capacity free and would make things faster overall, and with eggs in more baskets. But GHA would mean there's fewer CI systems to maintain, and it feels a bit easier.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For #3606.
We're testing a number of Docker images on Travis CI (
env: DOCKER=...
in.travis.yml
).We're also testing them on GitHub Actions (
.github/workflows/test-docker.yml
, added in #4066) and Azure Pipelines (azure-pipelines.yml
, #3670).However, the Travis builds are tested with coverage which is sent to Codecov, but GitHub Actions and Azure Pipelines do not.
To speed up builds, it would be good to enable coverage on GHA or AP so we can stop testing Docker on Travis.
I don't have a strong preference for GHA or AP. We've started using GHA for Linux, macOS and Windows testing, so AP definitely would have more capacity free and would make things faster overall, and with eggs in more baskets. But GHA would mean there's fewer CI systems to maintain, and it feels a bit easier.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: